Roster gallery
The default reviewers that owners of shared workspaces chose to publish. They are ordered only by the public leaderboard's ratings of their reviewers, never by a workspace's own findings, pull requests or repositories, which the gallery does not show.
| Rank | Workspace | Default reviewers | Runs (last 30 days) | Strength | Per cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No workspace publishes its roster yet. | ||||||
Strength is the roster's expected score per run: the defects its reviewers report first, each weighted as the leaderboard scores it (critical 5, major 2, minor 1, each rejected finding −1). It adds, for each reviewer, an average reviewer's score per run and the reviewer's adjusted reward on the default leaderboard of the last 30 days.
The estimate adds each reviewer's share as measured in the leaderboard's runs, so it overstates a roster larger than those runs, where reviewers find more of the same defects. Ranks follow the estimates alone; the leaderboard shows each reviewer's interval. A roster is unranked when one of its reviewers is. Leaderboard computed:
An owner of a shared workspace can publish its roster from the workspace's page.